CRIP UTOPIA AND THE FUTURE OF DISABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1918-6215.23383Abstract
Thomas More’s seminal work Utopia, written in 1516, has inspired works such as Robert Owen’s A New View of Society (1970) and H.G. Wells’ A Modern Utopia (2005), which theorize their own vision of a perfect society based on socialist ideals of co-operation, interdependence, unity, and harmony. Drawing on cultural Marxist Frederic Jameson’s (2001a; 2001b) critique of the Utopian genre, the author analyzes the two Utopias of Disability Studies scholars Vic Finkelstein (1975; 1980) and Adolf Ratzka (1998), as well as the Anti-Utopian responses of critics Paul Abberley (1996; 1997, 2002) and Tom Shakespeare (2002; 2006). While Utopians Finkelstein and Ratzka work toward dispelling what Jameson refers to as the “collective fantasy” of nondisabled people—that disability is preventable and antithetical to “the good life”—anti-Utopians Abberley and Shakespeare concentrate on the difficulties of the fluidity of the disability/impairment distinction central to Finkelstein’s emphasis on employment.Published
2009-11-11
Issue
Section
General
License
Authors retain copyright over their work and license their work for publication in Critical Disabilities Discourses under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivaties 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0). This means that the work is available for commercial and non-commercial use and reproduction provided that the original authors are credited and the original publication in this journal is cited, following standard academic practice.
How to Cite
CRIP UTOPIA AND THE FUTURE OF DISABILITY. (2009). Critical Disability Discourses, 1. https://doi.org/10.25071/1918-6215.23383