ABLEISM KITSCH: THE AESTHETICS OF DISABILITY-RELATED ETHICS

Authors

  • Julia Frances Gruson-Wood York University Critical Disability Studies

Abstract

This paper discusses the socio-political and ethical meanings of the various relationships between disablement, ableism, and ethics as they are generated through aesthetics, and does so by critiquing Tobin Siebers's article “Disability Aesthetics” (2006). Siebers claims that disability has a tacit and valuable presence in western art. Disability is esteemed when represented in art, yet devalued in normative social relations. The author thus critiques disability aesthetics by investigating the beautiful, the sublime, “madness”, “mental impairment”, ableism, kitsch, and cultural appropriation. From this the author argues that disability aesthetics is a spectacularized, once removed, representational deviance from the humdrum normalization of western culture, providing contact with the intense, unusual, and shocking. By providing the gestures of transformation within the safety net of image, art is a virtual escape from the hyper-real predictability of hegemony; it is a secure place to experience, respond, flirt, and abandon difference in the vortex of representation.

Author Biography

Julia Frances Gruson-Wood, York University Critical Disability Studies

Critical Disability Studies Masters Student

Downloads

Published

2009-11-11

How to Cite

Gruson-Wood, J. F. (2009). ABLEISM KITSCH: THE AESTHETICS OF DISABILITY-RELATED ETHICS. Critical Disability Discourses, 1. Retrieved from https://cdd3.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/23387

Issue

Section

General