ABLEISM KITSCH: THE AESTHETICS OF DISABILITY-RELATED ETHICS
Abstract
This paper discusses the socio-political and ethical meanings of the various relationships between disablement, ableism, and ethics as they are generated through aesthetics, and does so by critiquing Tobin Siebers's article “Disability Aesthetics” (2006). Siebers claims that disability has a tacit and valuable presence in western art. Disability is esteemed when represented in art, yet devalued in normative social relations. The author thus critiques disability aesthetics by investigating the beautiful, the sublime, “madness”, “mental impairment”, ableism, kitsch, and cultural appropriation. From this the author argues that disability aesthetics is a spectacularized, once removed, representational deviance from the humdrum normalization of western culture, providing contact with the intense, unusual, and shocking. By providing the gestures of transformation within the safety net of image, art is a virtual escape from the hyper-real predictability of hegemony; it is a secure place to experience, respond, flirt, and abandon difference in the vortex of representation.Published
2009-11-11
How to Cite
Gruson-Wood, J. F. (2009). ABLEISM KITSCH: THE AESTHETICS OF DISABILITY-RELATED ETHICS. Critical Disability Discourses, 1. Retrieved from https://cdd3.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/23387
Issue
Section
General
License
Authors retain copyright over their work and license their work for publication in Critical Disabilities Discourses under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivaties 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0). This means that the work is available for commercial and non-commercial use and reproduction provided that the original authors are credited and the original publication in this journal is cited, following standard academic practice.